I wonder what “They” were thinking when “They” passed the law
of reserving 25% seats for unprivileged children in privileged
schools?I don’t mean to discriminate between the citizens of this nation, but is it right for “Them” to pass this law on a pretext to cease this discrimination, and in turn give rise to more of it?
It begins with the smallest things of concern, their bags, their books and their clothes and shoes. How are the underprivileged people going to afford three uniforms a week, when they can’t afford two meals a day?
Then comes the social standing of the classes. Will the rich be comfortable with their children mixing up with children who belong to the lower strata of society? I don’t think so. Or even if the rich mix up with them, will the poor children not be jealous of their rich friends? The poor children will always want to have the better and nicer things, and they will want them at any cost, thus giving a way for crime.
Also, we have to think about the poor children and the trauma they will undergo, if they are not able to cope in their new schools. And then even if the fees of these schools will be comparatively less for them, will they be able to provide their children with coaching classes and other talent classes?
Thus passing this law has not really changed the scenario, because even though the education level may increase, the social harmony will decrease, causing discrimination between the classes.
Actually “They” should have just tried to change the current
level of the education system in the government schools and improved them
rather than making the already unmanaged system more unmanageable. I just hope
all turns out well for the children!